Friday, October 13, 2023

Can God Use the Government? (Reflections on Pentecost 21, Year A 2023)

 

Isaiah's image of the "Destruction of Babylon: Dore (19th Cent.)

“I form light and create darkness, I make weal and create woe; I the Lord do all these things. (Isaiah 45:7)

“Give therefore to the emperor the things that are the emperor’s, and to God the things that are God’s.” (Matthew 22:21)

Can God use an ungodly person or government for a godly purpose? The author of Third Isaiah seemed to think so. In the First Lesson appointed for Pentecost 21 in the revised Common Lectionary (Isaiah 45:1-7) the writer refers to Cyrus II of Persia as the Lord’s “anointed.” This is the same title as the Messiah or the Christ. The weird thing here is that Cyrus wasn’t even Jewish. He was a foreign warrior and emperor known for opening huge cans of whoop-ass on less mighty empires and acquiring their real estate for himself and the good folks of Persia. In Isaiah 45 he’s just about to give a smack-down to the Babylonian empire. Our writer thinks this is pretty cool because the Babylonians have been holding Jewish folks hostage for about sixty years.[i] Third Isaiah (whoever he was) is convinced the Almighty, having decided the disobedient Chosen People have suffered enough (and knowing that most of the original exiles have died of old age by this time anyway!), has anointed Cyrus II to kick the snot out of Babylon and free the Jews so they can go back to their ancestral land, rebuild their temple, and try to do things right this time.

In the world of Third Isaiah, it’s obvious Persia’s invasion of Babylon and the defeat of the once-mighty Babylonians is all part of God’s wild and wacky plan for humanity. The writer tells us God “makes weal and creates woe,” so if anything goes down, it’s because God wants it to happen. Bad things happen because that’s just how God rolls.

Anybody have a problem with that?

I guess if you’re a Jew living in exile in Babylon and some foreign conqueror comes along, beats up your captors, and lets you go back to the land your parents kept going on about, you might be pretty jazzed and inclined to offer God a big prayer of thanks. But, if you happen to be a Babylonian civilian and these Persians invade your country in their big chariots and start killing your soldiers, running over your toddlers in the street, and proclaiming they’re the one in charge now, you might not think that was so groovy.

I find it’s a bad idea to try to psychoanalyze God. It’s pretty arrogant of us to think we can assign a divine motive to violence and catastrophe. I’m much more comfortable believing the leaders of Judah, sixty years before Cyrus came on the scene, neglected their responsibility to their people, let their country get weak, and were too arrogant about their military and their “exceptionalism” to listen to God’s prophets or withstand the ambitions of Babylon. God did not punish them. They brought it on themselves. I have a hard time swallowing the notion that God ever wants to see any of God’s children suffer, Our disobedience, however, will have natural consequences.

We’re really stepping into the quicksand whenever we start asking, “Why did God do this?” or “Why did God let this happen?” If we buy into Third Isaiah’s belief that God anointed a Persian conqueror to slaughter Babylonians so the Jews could return to their homeland, we might jump to the absurd conclusion that God anointed Hitler to slaughter six million Jews so displaced Holocaust victims could also return to the land promised to Abraham and his descendants. I think we’re better off not going there. Let’s just acknowledge that weal and woe exist together on this crazy planet. Sometimes things are going to get very ugly, but the people of God have a responsibility to seek God’s loving purpose in the midst of the nightmares.

I write these lines in the aftermath of the terrorist attack by Hamas on Israel. I think many Americans have a stereotypical view of events in the Near East—we see only good, democratic Jews (who are, a after all, the heroes of two-thirds of the Bible) and evil Muslim terrorists.

I have tried to be more sympathetic to the Palestinian cause. My thinking was enlarged by a seminary buddy of mine, now the Reverend Khader El-Yateem, a Palestinian who had been jailed, beaten, and finally released after two weeks in custody by the IDF without ever being told why he was arrested. Khader, like many Christian residents of the West Bank, is a Lutheran. Indeed, we have many fellow Christians living under occupation in Israel, often denied basic rights such as the right to vote or to become citizens. Israel’s record on human rights isn’t the greatest. Nevertheless, nothing can excuse the savage atrocities recently perpetrated by Hamas. It is certain the Israeli government will do what is necessary to protect its citizens, and more bloodshed will follow.

I can’t imagine any of this is the will of God.

I’m guessing the compilers of the Revised Common Lectionary married the story of the Persian invasion and deliverance to Jesus’ admonition to “render unto Caesar”[ii] in our gospel lesson (Matthew 22:15-22) as a way of illustrating how God once used temporal powers to accomplish God’s purpose. Jesus isn’t telling us that all secular authority is evil or blasphemous or over-taxing or trying to take away our individual liberties. I think, rather, he’s trying to teach us to give to God what properly belongs to God—our hearts, souls, and minds. If we as a people can choose to be obedient to God’s Law and learn mercy and compassion and justice, then the governments we create and to which we pledge allegiance will be wholesome extensions of God’s purpose.

Sadly, such governments may find, as Israel finds now, that difficult decisions need to be made and unpleasant duties need to be performed in a sinful world. A much smarter fellow than I, Martin Luther, put it like this:

“Since a true Christian lives and labors on earth not for himself alone but for his neighbors, he does by the very nature of his spirit even what he himself has no need of but is needful and useful to his neighbor. Because the sword is most beneficial and necessary for the whole world in order to preserve peace, punish sin, and restrain the wicked, the Chrisitan submits most willingly to the rule of the sword, pays his taxes, honors those in authority, serves, helps, and does all he can to assist the governing authority, that it may continue to function and  be held in honor and fear. Although he has no need of these things for himself—to him they are not essential—nevertheless, he concerns himself about what is serviceable and of benefit to others.”[iii]

There were terrorist acts in Luther’s day, too[iv], and Luther believed the governing authorities acted as God’s instrument when they protected the citizenry and restrained the terrorists (however excessively 16th century monarchs were inclined to do so!). But Luther also recognized that God’s work could be done when the same authorities created infrastructure for farmers, fed the poor, and educated the children. Governments could, indeed, be godly vessels—but only as godly as the people who comprise them.

This is a scary world, my friends. Let’s be intentional about rendering our hearts to God. Keep praying for an end to violence anywhere, keep alert to what’s going on, and try to be as responsible a citizen as you can.

Thanks for letting me share my thoughts with you this week.



[i] From 587 BCE to 539 BCE if you’re into history. That’s according to Wikipedia (What else?)

[ii] That’s how verse 21 reads in the old King James version.

[iii] From Luther’s 1523 treatise “Temporal Authority: To What Extent It Should be Obeyed” quoted in Martin Luther’s Basic Theological Writings (Timothy Lull, editor. Augsburg Fortress Press, 1989)

[iv] Think of the German Peasant’s Revolt of 1524-5 which Luther both inspired and denounced.

No comments:

Post a Comment